However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On June 13, 2019, the Defendant, by telephone, received a proposal that “a loan can be made, but to obtain a loan due to low credit rating, the details of transactions must be created,” and then, accepted the proposal that “a loan will be made if money is transferred to another account in the name of the Party (hereinafter referred to as “B”) and then the account number in the Defendant’s name Cbank account (D) was sent to B at that time.” At that time, the Defendant was notified to B of the account number in the Defendant’s name.

However, the Defendant was well aware of the process of receiving the loan and implementing the loan, and the loan method that B proceeds was an emergency, and did not confirm whether B works for the lending company. The Defendant was aware that the Cze Card transferred by the Defendant was used in the crime of Bosing prior to the second month was used in the crime of Bosing, and that the abnormal loan method could be used in the crime of Bosing. During withdrawing the deposited money, the Defendant was aware of the fact that B is an employee of the Financial Fraud Group.

On the other hand, at around June 12, 2019, the members of the Bosing Financial Fraud Group, including B, were transferred to the C bank account in the name of the Defendant on June 14, 2019, and the Defendant, upon receiving the victim’s defrauded’s instructions, withdrawn each money by cash, and then delivered it to the bearer bank account designated by B, while “it is possible to obtain a loan at a low interest rate of 3% per annum, but it is possible to transfer the existing loan to a designated account due to the repayment of the existing loan,” by phoneing the victim E at the victim E, and then transfer it to the victim on June 14, 2019.

This is the defendant.