However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On March 20, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Sung-nam branch of Suwon District Court on March 20, 2009, and on February 3, 2010, a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same crime at least twice in the same court.

On December 26, 2014, at around 23:06, the Defendant driven a benz vehicle at a section of about 1k meters from the raw ginseng distance front of the raw ginseng raw ginseng located in the same city, from the influence 0.101% of the blood alcohol concentration at a 0.101% of the blood alcohol concentration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the state of the state of the driving of alcohol, inquiry into the results of the crackdown on the driving of alcohol, a written appraisal of blood alcohol, and a written report on the state of the driver;

1. Previouss before judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, references to criminal records, amounts of dispositions, and results of confirmation;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (the fact that the defendant repents and reflects his mistake, and the circumstances leading to the instant crime, etc. shall be considered);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. An order to attend a compliance driving lecture in order to prevent recidivism, taking into consideration the fact that he/she again drives under the influence of alcohol even though he/she had a record of punishment for drinking driving, such as before the judgment of the accused, even though he/she had a record of driving under the influence of alcohol;