except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 17, 2012, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would make payment immediately to the victim D, who operates C in Mapo-si, a member city of Mapo-si, for each delivery of 17,190 g, 5,161 g, the steel size of 10 meters in size, 3,764 g, 13m size, 17,190 g, 16m size, and 5,161 g, respectively, at the construction site located in Yongsan-si, Si, Si, Masan-si.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price.

Therefore, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was supplied by the victim with 23,622,610 won at the market price around that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 347 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] General Fraud (less than KRW 100,000) (6-10,000) and there is no basic area (6-1,000) [6-1,00), [6-1,00] [the decision of sentencing] and the amount of damage was not significant, and the defendant did not faithfully engage in the trial, and thus, the defendant's liability for the crime cannot be deemed to be less than that of the defendant. However, in the process of performing multiple construction works, the defendant was unable to undergo funds shortage problems, resulting in the crime of this case, and the defendant did not have the power to commit a crime exceeding the fine, and the suspended sentence was determined by taking