A A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,00,00, by a fine of KRW 500,000,000, for each of the offenses against Defendant B, C, D, E, F, and G.

Defendant

A, B, C, and.

All the Defendants are victims’ employees belonging to MNS Co., Ltd., Ltd., an intra-company subcontractor located in MNS L, Defendant A is the representative for the operation of the PP branch MF branch MF branch in metal labor union, Defendant B is the full-time employees of the PP branch in metal labor union, Defendant C is the full-time employees of the PP branch in metal labor union, the full-time employees of the PP branch in metal union, Defendant C is the representative of the PP branch in metal union, Defendant C is the executive members of the PP branch in metal union, and Defendant E is the head of the policy department in metal union, the MV branch in metal labor union, and Defendant E is the members of the P, Defendant F, Defendant G, Defendant G, and the M

The Defendants, at the Manon- full-time branch of the Chungcheongnam-nam branch of metal labor union, requested the cooperation companies of MN factories to stabilize, improve their treatment, guarantee labor union activities, etc., and conspired to address the existing treatment of the victim company and interfere with the business affairs of the victim company.

1. Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant P, Defendant D, Defendant H, Defendant F, along with members of the metal labor union MF branch MF branch from May 3, 2013 to May 15:55, 2013, the Defendants demanded wage increase from the above victim’s office’s O office from May 3, 2013 to 15:19 on the same day. The victim’s management department Q Q is currently working hours, and thus, the victim’s management department Q is still working hours, so it is reasonable several times to select a representative and appoint a representative if the recommendation is made to the company. However, it interfered with the victim’s business by force for approximately twenty-four minutes by preventing employees in the office from performing their duties during working hours.

2. Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant P, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant G, and Defendant H demanded wage discounts from around 15:00 on May 6, 2013 to 15:25 on the same day with members of the metal labor union MV branch MV branch.