폭행
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the relationship between the Defendant and the neighboring residents living in the Dong and Dong and about 30 years, which is not good for appraisal due to the problem of cultivation in the dry field that is actually lent to each other.
On April 18, 2012, at around 15:00, the Defendant assaulted the victim by putting the Defendant’s oil he stored in a dry field near the Haak-gun, Haak-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, with “ why is left without permission,” and putting the Defendant into resisting why she spawn in a dry field near the Haak-gun, Haak-gun.”
2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the defendant in this court, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.