However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2014. 8. 2. 04:00경 양산시 B에 있는 양산경찰서 C파출소에서 이전에 벌금 미납으로 인해 노역장 유치를 당한 것에 불만을 품은 나머지 “D, 어데있노, 내 씹할 그 새끼 때문에 경찰서 갔다 왔다, 그 놈아 어데있노.”라고 큰소리로 욕설을 하여 위 파출소 소속 경찰관인 경사 E(41세)으로부터 “선생님, 시간이 너무 늦은 새벽시간이고 D는 내일 저녁에 근무를 하니 볼일 있으시면 내일 저녁에 찾아오세요.”라는 말을 듣자 격분하여 위 E에게 “이 씹할새끼는 뭐꼬, 니 내하고 한번 해볼래 밖으로 나와 봐라, 좆만한기.”라고 욕설을 하며 손으로 위 E의 목을 1회 때리면서 양손으로 멱살을 잡고 흔들었다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the commuting of the police box.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] is that there are many criminal records in the basic area of category 1 (Obstruction of Performance of Duties and Force of Duties) (6-1 year and April). The majority of the criminal records are chosen to punish a person on the ground that the punishment is not good in the motive or appearance of the crime because it is not good for the motive or appearance of the crime due to a case where the police box, who is dissatisfied with the previous measures and directly finds the police box, directly finds the

However, the execution of punishment is suspended in consideration of the fact that the error is recognized and reflected, and the fact that it is not followed as a serious result, but it is deemed that there is a risk of recidivism, so probation and social service for a considerable period should be ordered.