However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Interference with business;

A. From October 18, 2015 to around 20:30 on the same day, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to take care of the victim’s “scopic” to the victim’s “scopic” without any reason on the ground of the E convenience points located in D when the victim C(s) works as an employee from around 19:00 on the same day, and repeated the Defendant’s behavior against the non-personal customers who found the place to take advantage of his or her career to prevent him or her from taking advantage of his or her career.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's convenience store operation by force.

B. On October 20, 2015, from around 13:00 on the same day to around 14:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) stated that the “H restaurant operation of the Victim G (n), which was located in F on the Jeju 14:00 on two occasions; (b) Ha, the Defendant: (c) stated that the Defendant had “in-house parking lots, it has been well parked; and (d) has gathered customers in the name of customers”; and (c) provided the victim with a prush, such as “in-house parking lots, as he/she has made a good parking lot, he/she has taken a large voice.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force.

C. On October 20, 2015, from around 09:00 on the same day to around 20:40 on several occasions, the Defendant repeated actions to avoid disturbance on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant: (b) on several occasions against the players passing from the “K” route for the operation of the Victim J (the age of 48) by the victim J (the age of 48) on several occasions; (c) on the part of the customers who enter the said trade name with a large interest; and (d) “I see this building with a maximum of ten billion won; and (d) I see that I am.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's smooth operation by force.

On October 20, 2015, from around 12:00 on the same day to around 21:00 on the same day, the Defendant took several times as “M” restaurant for the victim L(33 years old) operation in the Jeju city, and repeated actions, such as taking waste, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force.

E. The Defendant, from October 20, 2015 to around 15:00 on the same day, is deemed as F at Jeju.