Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be paid.

From June 2017 to June 2, 2017, the Defendant was a person working as a father center of the company (ju) and the victim D (n 24 taxes) was a person working as an employee of the said company from July 2, 2017 to September 2, 2017.

On August 20, 2017, between 06:00 and 08:00, the Defendant committed an indecent act by taking advantage of the victim’s state of resistance, by finding out the victim who was divingd by the Defendant from the back seat of the passenger car volume owned by the Defendant, which was parked in front of the F District, and by taking advantage of the victim’s personal condition of resistance by taking the victim’s left hand into account.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and H;

1. Article 299 and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. Where a conviction becomes final and conclusive on the facts constituting a sex offense subject to registration and submission of personal information under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant becomes a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information to the relevant agency pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act.

In light of the Defendant’s age, occupation, risk of recidivism, type of crime, motive, process of crime, seriousness of crime, disclosure order or notification order, the degree and anticipated side effects of the Defendant’s disadvantage and expected side effects, the preventive effects of sexual crime subject to registration that may be achieved therefrom, and the effect of protecting the victims thereof, the Defendant is against the protection of children and juveniles.