beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.02.16 2014고단2401

사기등

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from around July 2010, sold Dolls D in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, a person who sold Dolls D from around July 2013, sold Dolls from the Dolls.

During the process of piling up kind E and piling up, when the defendant receives a loan by using the fact that E is believed to be a usual defendant, he used the name of E to put up E as a joint guarantor or receive a direct loan in the name of E.

1. Around October 7, 2013, the Defendant was trying to change the term “a loan already obtained,” to the term “a substitute loan,” from the D store.

The identity card and resident registration transcript of one workplace who is insured with four insurances are required. It is not required to obtain a loan in four names, but it is not a four household guarantee.

“A false speech was received from E the driver’s license and resident registration abstract.”

On October 15, 2013, the Defendant called an employee who could not know the names of the victim (the State) in the above store and ordered E to become a joint and several surety of the Defendant. As above, the Defendant deceivings the said employee by submitting a joint and several surety contract under the name of the Defendant’s forged E around October 18, 2013, including the initial driving license and resident registration license issued by E, and the following 2.

However, the Defendant did not have obtained permission for joint and several sureties from E, and at the time, the Defendant had a debt of KRW 45 million in the second financial right, such as Russnb, and operated by the Defendant.

D as well as personnel's monthly wage, etc. were pushed down and prevented from returning the principal and interest, etc. with the loan. Therefore, there was no intention or ability to make a normal joint and several surety or to pay the loan normally.

However, the Defendant loans from the above victims to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.