양수금
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant A shall have full payment of KRW 53,704,278 and KRW 26,294,390 among them from July 9, 2014.
1. The following facts of recognition do not conflict between the Parties, or are recognized by the statements in Gap evidence 1 to 5 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence 1:
A. The Plaintiff acquired the claim against Defendant A and F, such as the description of the grounds for the claim in the attached Form.
B. On May 15, 2006, F succeeded to the shares of 1/5 shares of the deceased’s property on the deceased’s children. However, the Defendants reported the qualified acceptance of the deceased’s inherited property on August 9, 2006 by Jeonju District Court Decision 2006Ra475.
2. If so, Defendant A is liable to pay the money indicated in the order as the principal debtor to the Plaintiff, and the remaining Defendants are jointly and severally liable with Defendant A to pay the money indicated in the order equivalent to each inheritance share among the net F’s obligations within the scope of the property inherited from the networkF.
3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is justified.