공사대금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the cause of the instant claim. Around May 6, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) executed electrical construction among the construction works for multi-household-type multi-household-type multi-household-type multi-household-type multi-household-type multi-household-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-
2. The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendants agreed to pay the above construction cost to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff’s claim is without merit, as there is no evidence to acknowledge otherwise.
Furthermore, even if the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff had engaged in electrical construction and additional construction as alleged by the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise, the Plaintiff’s claim does not appear to be any mother and without merit.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.