The defendant, who is her husband, has winded with C and D.

In doubt, C has set up a tape recorder on the vehicle operated by C, recorded the conversation between C and D, and recorded it, and C has the intention to use it as evidence of the lawsuit of divorce filed against the defendant.

On September 2014, the Defendant: (a) installed a small tape recorder under C’s command of the chief of a passenger vehicle operation in the oil apartment parking lot located in the Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S. around 1017; and (b) recorded a conversation between C and D, which took place within the said passenger vehicle around that time.

The defendant recorded a conversation between others that is not open to the public.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C (Evidence No. 9-16)

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a recording recording (Evidence No. 64-70 of the evidence record);

1. Article 16 (1) 1 and the main sentence of Article 3 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Communications Secrets concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Four months of imprisonment to be suspended and one year of suspension of qualifications;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence of sentence (see, e., the fact that the defendant is recognized to commit the instant crime; the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment; and that there are no