A. On January 29, 1950, the residents of Qu-gun, North Korea, from North Korea, cooperate with the police by providing food, etc. to a prompt threat in a situation where the police power is insufficient. At that time, Qu-gun, who was the head of Qu-gu, cooperates with the police as soon as possible. On January 29, 1950, 10 residents of Qu-gun, who were arrested by the police belonging to the police station of the State Police Station and were arrested by three residents of the same village in front of the Pyeongtaek Village.

At the time of discovery, the networkO was faced with the back part of the front part of the head when he was able to cut trees and back his hand.

On the other hand, the deceased O's dynamic P was missing around that time.

(The networkO, P, hereinafter referred to as “the network”). B.

The Committee on the Settlement of History for Truth established pursuant to the Framework Act on the Settlement of History for the Truth of the Decision of the Committee on the Settlement of Truth (hereinafter “Act on the Settlement of History”) for the Settlement of Truth (hereinafter “The Committee on the Settlement of History”) shall, upon receipt of an application for ascertaining the truth from May 21, 2008 to May 18, 2010, make a decision to conduct an investigation after receiving an application for ascertaining the truth from the victims of the civilian sacrifice in the previous North Korean region, etc., the Committee on the Settlement of History for the Settlement of Truth, based on the applicant investigation, reference witness investigation, data investigation and field investigation, etc. on the case of the civilian sacrifice that occurred in the previous North Korean region, made a decision to ascertain the truth on June 30, 2010 on the basis of the statement of bereaved family members, statements of reference witnesses, and whether to recover the body. The Plaintiff’s application for ascertaining the truth against the deceased was dismissed, but the objection raised by the Plaintiff thereafter was accepted, and the decision was made

C. As the bereaved family members of the deceased in relation to their status relationship, there was the wife of father R, mother S, siblings T, U, V, Plaintiff I, and the networkO, and Plaintiff D and A.

Plaintiff

B, C, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, and N are sculptures of the deceased.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 to 6, 8, 9, 12 to 14 each.