Seized evidence 1 or 2 shall be confiscated from the accused.

The Defendant, as the relationship between the victim C (77 tax) and the wife and the head of the region, was the case where the victim was unable to live a normal life due to being used as a brain stroke for two years, and the Defendant did not receive any particular compensation even though the victim aided the business of the “E” restaurant located in the Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu, which was operated by the victim, and attempted to visit the hospital of the victim, but rather, did not receive any compensation. Therefore, the Defendant did not have any sufficient appraisal on the victim.

The Defendant prepared in advance to cover up excessive (20cm in length, 10cm in length) at a powder wing place on April 14, 2017, and found the above E cafeteria around 08:26 on April 14, 2017, and used the above excessive portion to the victim in that place. The Defendant “?”

is knife.

p. Hexa drat drat z.

whether there is any demand to pay the money or not.

If you consider to demand money, the money shall be given to him or her

In order for the victim to refrain from doing so, the victim set the above excessive amount in hand and set up the excessive amount in excess, and set up approximately 2 cm in length, approximately 5 cm in depth, approximately 5 cm in length, and approximately 3-4 cm in depth between the left hand and the inspection place of the victim.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous things as above and brought the victim with the number of days of treatment, such as hump, hump, and other blood hump damage and heat damage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on diagnosis certificates and photographs of bodily injury;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act include: (a) there is little history of punishment; (b) the victim was unable to reach an agreement; and (c) the victim was examined by looking at the victim suffering from a disease between the victim and his/her wife; and (d) the victim was able to distort the good faith of the defendant; and (c) the victim was committed in the context of the crime of this case.