성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the above judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.
1. The summary of the facts charged is Defendant B’s business owner of the “Eel” located in Gwangju-si, and Defendant A is an employee of the Maurel.
Although the Defendants, around January 15, 2014, knew of the fact that the above "Eel" was about 23:54, and "F amusement shop", the Defendants provided the above 510 Moel to be engaged in commercial sex acts by providing the above 10 Moel as a commercial sex acts place, and received substitute fees from the above F amusement shop business owner from May 15, 2013 to January 15, 2014, and Defendant A provided the above Moel as a commercial sex acts place from November 7, 2013 to January 15, 2014 to receive entertainment fees from the entertainment shop business owner.
Accordingly, the defendant conspireds to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.
2. According to the records, I, J, and G drink at the main station around January 15, 2014, and Defendant B operated alcoholic beverages at Defendant B, and Defendant A engaged in sexual traffic in the Eel where Defendant A works as an employee, and Defendant A took charge of sexual traffic in the police officer. Defendant A, around January 15, 2014, lent a guest room to two men, who had been working for the Fudio-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scop-scing.
According to the above facts, there is a strong doubt as to whether the customers who sent the defendants to the above Mona amusement center were aware that they are engaging in sexual traffic.
However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, i.e., Defendant A’s cleaning work at the above telecom on or around November 7, 2013, and Defendant A’s cleaning work from January 12, 2014.