A. misunderstanding of facts: ① With respect to the settlement of provisional receipts equivalent to KRW 127,80,000 for D, Seoul Southern District Court 2008 Gahap13099 (principal lawsuit), 2009 Gahap13904 (Counterclaim), and the case of return of provisional receipts (hereinafter “civil first instance court”) [Seoul High Court 2010Na16771 (principal lawsuit), 2010Na1678 (Counterclaim)] of the appellate court [the appellate court 2010Na1678 (Counterclaim),” hereinafter “civil appellate court 200,000,” and hereinafter “civil first instance court 10,000,000,000 won as a witness of the court of first instance, the appellate court did not err in the conclusion of the judgment of the court below as otherwise stated in the facts charged by the Defendant’s testimony at the court of first instance 200,7184,000,000 won or less, as evidence and evidence of the above 3.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (2 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (1) According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the following facts are acknowledged.

D shall establish C around 1997, and thereafter C.