However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant committed the following crimes under the state that the defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to the modern editing illness:

On May 5, 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, at around 15:36, on May 5, 2016, the Defendant 2016, on the front side of the “D” located in the wife population C; (b) was passing from F to the police officer belonging to the Dong-dong Police Station E division of the Kandong Police Station, Chungcheongnam-do, which was undergoing a traffic arrangement to maintain the order at the assembly site; and (c) was called “dleh”, and was hicking with a quih hand with the face of the said G having the face of the said global belt, with the face of the said G having the seat of the said global belt, and walked three times as a stop.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention of crimes and maintenance of order.

"2016 Highest 4484"

1. On May 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) removed, in his/her hand, an unregistered acrylic advertising board in the market price, which is attached to the wall wall of the cash withdrawal machine No. 57, within the limit of 365 Cop, Ltd. of the Victim Livestock Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim No. 365”), the Defendant: (b) removed, and damaged, in his/her own possession, an unregistered acrylic advertising board in the market price, which is attached to the wall of the cash withdrawal machine No. 57.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above place around 20:30 on the same day, and around 20:30 on the same day, he listened to the reporter’s statement, and demanded the Defendant to present his identification card, the Defendant she saw the face of the above H one time by her hand while taking a bath to the above H, and saw the demand her face.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the protection of people's lives, bodies, public peace and order, etc.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 2699"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Investigation report and photographs of damaged parts (the defendant and his defense counsel will block the passage of the defendant by the F who is a police officer.