1. On November 2014, the Defendant drafted a false statement of complaint against the Defendant E and F using the Defendant’s computer at the office of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwangjin-gu, 205 and 904 on the first day of November, 2014, and the content of the complaint “Defendant E, a party to the lawsuit, around October 20, 201, paid KRW 475 million upon withdrawal of provisional attachment and compulsory request for auction against the 20 households, including G 101, 201, 201, 200,000 won, and KRW 230,000,000 to receive loans from the Ha branch of the credit cooperative of thischeon-gu, Seoul, and 200,000 won as collateral for the above apartment 20,000 won to pay KRW 230,000,000,000 to the Defendant’s 204,000,000 won.

On November 11, 2014, the Defendant continued to receive the above complaint from the civil petition office of the Dongcheon Police Station in Leecheon-si, Leecheon-si, 32, and received the investigation from the complainant at the investigation office of the Leecheon-gu Police Station and the economic team office of the same month, and agreed to pay the complainant KRW 475 million upon withdrawal of provisional attachment and compulsory request for auction. Of which, the Defendant promised to pay KRW 230 million to the complainant, the actual owner of the 20 household of the G apartment to pay KRW 475 million upon the main withdrawal of provisional attachment and compulsory request for auction, the Defendant trusted that the above apartment 20 households would immediately receive the loan at the H branch of the Leecheon-si Credit Cooperative, Leecheon-si, and the Defendant Nonparty F would pay KRW 230 million as a loan on the condition of provisional attachment and compulsory auction cancellation.

The defendant, who promised to pay KRW 475 million, stated that "The punishment is changed because the defendant's tenant committed a promise to pay KRW 475 million."

However, fact is about October 26, 2014 by E.