However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-learning car.

On May 20, 2017, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.132% from blood alcohol level around 21:50, and driven the said vehicle along the two-lanes toward Yong-Namnam University in the direction of driving the three-lane road in the Gyeongsan City C.

At the time, a vehicle in the signal waiting at the front section was stopped, so there was a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by accurately manipulating the front section and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was negligent in operating the vehicle in the same lane and was driven by the victim E (62) who stops in the same traffic signal atmosphere on the same lane and received the part of the driver behind the F Spon vehicle, which was driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim E, such as catum salt in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim G (V, 5 years of age) who was accompanied by the above spawn vehicle, requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim H (V, 58 years of age) who was accompanied by the above spawn vehicle, for about two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Investigation report on actual condition, on-site photographs, report on the situation of the driver placed at home, inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking driving, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (victim E telephone communications);

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2 (2) 2 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 44 (1) of the same Act concerning the driving of alcohol;

1. The crimes provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act among crimes of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) and the crimes of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against E with the largest criminal situation.