사기
Articles 1 and 2-2 of the Judgment of the Defendant
(a) 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor, No. 2 of the holding
(b) Imprisonment for a crime;
Punishment of the crime
On September 15, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for embezzlement, etc., and two years of suspended execution, which became final and conclusive on May 7, 201. On May 13, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and three months of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court, and two years of suspended execution, which became final and conclusive on May 21, 201.
The Defendant is a person who has received investment money from investors under the pretext of futures and options trading and has operated it.
The Defendant, who received money from a large number of persons as a means of investment or loan from the said persons and received a demand for return of the said person’s investment or loan money, and received a criminal complaint from the said persons who did not receive such money, and invested in futures, options trading, etc. after receiving the money as investment or loan money, had no intent or ability to guarantee the principal and return the proceeds. Although it is uncertain in light of the characteristics of futures and options trading and reasonable risk of losses, the Defendant was willing to acquire money for the purpose of investment or loan by making a false statement to guarantee the principal and guarantee high-rate profits.
1. On July 2010, in a case where the defendant in the name of the investment money was at the confinement room of a governmental correctional institution located in Masan-dong in Masan-dong on the date of July 2010, the defendant would make it possible for the victim AD, who was under the jurisdiction of the High Government District Court, to make it possible for the victim AD to make a criminal agreement amounting to KRW 35 million by making a profit if he/she pays the investment money in her ability to live in the state of pregnancy. On August 2010, 2010, he/she would make it possible for the victim's husband AE only or "the wife is unable to deliver it in the correctional institution." If he/she collects money from the defendant to the maximum extent possible, he/she will increase it into a gift or option, and if he/she pays money to him/her.