A. Defendant B’s KRW 300,000 and its amount are 5% per annum from January 28, 2016 to May 20, 2016.

A. The Plaintiff and Defendant B married on September 19, 2012.

B. On July 18, 2014, Defendant B filed a lawsuit claiming the payment of judicial divorce and consolation money, alleging that the marriage relationship became the main cause of the Plaintiff’s mistake (such as the Plaintiff’s wife’s complaint, etc.) and the failure of the marriage. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for this reason.

8. On September 29, 29, Defendant B filed a counterclaim claiming a judicial divorce and the payment of consolation money, alleging that the marriage relationship became the main cause of the mistake (the Defendant C and the wrongful act, etc.) and led to the failure of marriage

[B] The Mineju Family Court 2014ddan32442 (principal lawsuit), 2014ddan33124 (Counterclaim), and hereinafter “instant divorce lawsuit”).

In the instant divorce lawsuit, on March 31, 2015, the Plaintiff and Defendant B entered into a mediation to the effect that the part of the instant claim for judicial divorce is divorced, and ② both the principal claim and the counterclaim claim are dismissed on July 3, 2015. Of the costs of lawsuit, the part of the lawsuit is assessed against Defendant B, and the part of the counterclaim is assessed against the Plaintiff. On December 22, 2015, each appeal filed by the Plaintiff and Defendant B is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against each party, and on April 28, 2016, the judgment was pronounced to dismiss the Plaintiff’s appeal.

On July 2, 2014, upon Defendant B’s request, rendered ad hoc measure order to the Plaintiff on September 1, 2014, to prohibit access within 100 meters from Defendant B’s residence and not transmit the language, image, etc. by means of Defendant B’s handphone or e-mail.

(2014douju Family Court). e.

On January 2015, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit claiming principal, interest, etc. with Defendant B by asserting that it lent KRW 134,600,000 to Defendant B, but the judgment dismissing the claim due to lack of evidence to acknowledge the above assertion.

(Seoul District Court Decision 2015Gahap50967 decided July 24, 2015). (Ground for recognition)