However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the above sentence shall be executed against the defendant.

1. Around 14:19 on June 23, 2019, the Defendant: (a) heard the horses to the effect that “the Defendant may be more responsible for the change of the lane” from the victim F, the police station affiliated with the said police station, and from the victim G, a assistant affiliated with the said police station, “I may be more responsible for the change of the lane” out of the victim F, the police station affiliated with the said police station; and (b) Ha, B, C, etc. were heard by the victims, and she was drinking by drinking water to the victims; (b) inside the police station, the victim f, the victim of the said police station, who was affiliated with the said police station, and the victim G, the said assistant affiliated with the said police station, and flasing the victims. I ambling the victims with drinking water and flas

2. While the Defendant continued to appear outside of the above E box, on the date and time set forth in Paragraph 1, “the police officers receive drinking water and take this treatment.” The Defendant stated that “the police officers may be punished as a crime of insult if they continue to take a bath, and if they are in doubt, they may arrest the Defendant in the crime of insult.” However, the Defendant continued to read “F and G to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of insult, with the words “I am flick, I am flick. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am.) and F and G sent the Defendant with the inside of the above slope, and the Defendant carried the body of the said G, sealed the body of the Defendant, and pushed the F’s body with his hand, and pushed the Defendant’s body with his hand.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning C, B, F, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (Attachment of a photograph of a dynamic image course);

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order.