However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 4, 2015, at around 00:50, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant’s wife C in the Defendant’s residence located in Asan City, Asan City, and then demanded that the Defendant present his identification card from E during the military patrol box sent out after receiving the report from the said C, and from the assistant F.

Accordingly, the Defendant expressed his bath to “Chewing police, present his identification card,” and the F assaulted “F’s left left part of the drinking by drinking the defective hand.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning the F;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Education [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6-1-4 months) of obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-4 months) (the special person who has been sentenced] of the basic area (6-1-4 months) of obstruction of performance of official duties (the decision of sentence] of the same kind of crime (the decision of sentence is reached to the crime of this case although it has served as a similar crime: Provided, That there