2. On May 27, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision on non-approval of an additional injury or disease against the Plaintiff.

A. On January 13, 2013, the Plaintiff was under occupational accident that occurred while serving in Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant accident”). The Plaintiff received medical care benefits for the instant accident under the medical care period “as regards the instant accident,” the term “as regards the instant accident,” the term “as regards the instant accident,” the term “non-aggravating lele of light-non-alley executivesralone, opical bones and thalethrostal stale, hair with internal organs, internal organs, thaleths, thale, thaleths, and thalethal thale of cokenes” (hereinafter “approval injury”).

B. On May 10, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for additional medical care benefits for an injury or disease on the ground that “the head award by fall on March 20, 2014” (hereinafter “the applicant’s injury or disease”).

C. On May 27, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision on non-approval of an additional injury or disease (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff on the ground that “the applicant injury or disease does not have a proximate causal relation with the instant accident” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 5, 6 evidence, Eul evidence 1-1, 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that there was a significant inconvenience in walking due to cerebral color among approved injury and disease, and that the Plaintiff was in a state of vavady with a high risk of vadying vadr due to the decline in recognition capacity for objects or spatial sense.

During the Plaintiff’s returning home after receiving a outpatient treatment due to an approved injury and injury, the Plaintiff caused a critical injury to the wind that goes beyond the first floor stairs of the first floor.

Therefore, since there is a proximate causal relation with the accident of this case, the instant disposition is unlawful.

(b) Entry in the attached Form of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

C. (1) The Plaintiff received hospitalized treatment from the Computerization Hospital on May 10, 2013 to January 10, 2014. From January 13, 2014 to January 13, 2014.

3. 20. Water treatment was received;

(2) During the treatment period, the Plaintiff is frequently due to cerebral chronism among approved injury and disease.