A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for four months, respectively.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, respectively.

No one shall provide game products for the distribution or use, the contents of which are different from those classified by the Game Products Management Committee, or display or store them for such purposes.

Nevertheless, from July 6, 2018 to July 31, 2018, Defendant A opened 50 games of “D”, which were classified by the Game Management Committee on the first floor, with the game of “D,” and operated the game of “D.,” Defendant A changed the appearance of the game machine by installing the card instruments inside the game machine so that it can not put an information card outside the game machine differently from the content of the rating. Although the game machine was rated as having no separate score system, Defendant A was rated as having the game machine’s “new Albl”, the social card was 1, 2, 4, etc. on the game screen, and it was found that there was a separate scores system such as 1, 2, 2018, 2, and 2, 2018, and 2, Defendant B provided an unspecified number of customers with the game machine change from around July 2018 to July 31, 2018.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to distribute or use game products with contents different from those rated by the Game Management Committee, or displayed or stored them for this purpose.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Answer of the result of enforcement support;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a monthly rent contract;

1. Article 45 of the relevant Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment of Crimes, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution;

1. Confiscation Defendant A: Article 48(1)1 and 2 of the Criminal Act.