손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is “C”, and around December 2015, the Defendant used the Plaintiff’s cargo vehicle until it accepted the proposal, and the Defendant permitted the Defendant to use the Plaintiff’s cargo vehicle until it performed the said scrap metal work.
However, the defendant's proposal for the above scrap metal work was false. Nevertheless, the defendant used the plaintiff's cargo vehicle from December 2, 2015 to June 2016 from June 2016 to doping, returned it to the state of trouble, used the plaintiff's solid goods as the defendant's personal warehouse, used wastes as the defendant's personal warehouse, interfere with the deceased's solid goods business, and did not pay the sales proceeds even though he left the goods owned by the plaintiff.
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 6,250,000 (i.e., KRW 3,00,000 for the cargo vehicle repair cost of KRW 5,00,00 for the cargo vehicle repair cost of KRW 5,00,00 for the cargo vehicle repair cost of KRW 500,00 for the waste disposal cost of KRW 1,80,00 for the cargo vehicle disposal cost of KRW
2. In light of the determination, the evidence alone submitted by the Plaintiff is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the damage incurred to the Plaintiff’s assertion and the amount of such damage reaches KRW 6,250,000, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
The plaintiff's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.