beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2017.09.26 2017고단1055

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Framework Act on Fire-Fighting shall interfere with the extinguishing of a fire, lifesaving, or first-aid services by using violence or intimidation against fire-fighters dispatched;

On July 2, 2017, around 04:08, the Defendant driven a BM5 car under the influence of alcohol from the long distance of the mother line located in the Macheon-si, Leecheon-si, Macheon-si, to turn to the left. The Defendant caused a traffic accident under the front part of the said car at the front part of the said car, which was sent to the victim C(I, 37 years of age) who was the fire brigade belonging to the Leecheon Fire Station and was dispatched to the 119 emergency medical center.

At around 04:23 on the same day, the Defendant, on the grounds that the injured party was prevented from assaulting the said D without any particular reason on the 119 first-aid vehicle where he was driving along the roads near the soft-dong in the same city on the same day, continued to walking the victim’s left side bridge one time, and was shaking the victim’s head bond with his hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with first aid activities by exercising assault against fire-fighters, and at the same time, damaged double sprinkes that require medical treatment for about 14 days.

2. On July 2, 2017, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling and smelling on the face of the Defendant, upon receiving a report on the occurrence of the same traffic accident as described in the foregoing 1. On the roads near the eth of the Snive Snive-dong, Snive-do, Snive-dong on July 2, 2017, when he/she was dispatched from E working in the Leecheon Police Station.

Even though there is a considerable reason to determine a person, he/she did not comply with a request for alcohol testing by a police officer without any justifiable reason, even though he/she was requested to comply with a drinking test by inserting the breath in the form of a

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;