However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On March 15, 2019, the Defendant driven a rocketing car on March 20:15, 2019, and proceeded on a two-lane road at the entrance of the funeral bridge, which is located in the 2025-dong 2025, from the side of the female fishery team, at approximately 117km each hour from the side of the mountain zone to the intersection.

At this point, the speed is 60 km per hour from the right side to the funeral bridge. In such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by complying with the speed and speed of the vehicle and operating the steering gear and the operation of the steering system accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and met the part of the victim C(S, 43 years old) driving with the back of the D Twit-Ra car, which was driven by the victim C(S, 43 years old), with the front part of the Defendant’s driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the victim E (V) (V) who is the passenger of the victim C driver’s troke car, for about 3 weeks of medical treatment, the victim E (V), such as mination of franchising executives in need of preferential treatment for about 4 months of treatment, franchising franchis, etc., the victim F (V, 40 years of age), and the victim G (V, 50 years of age), the victim H (V, 45 years of age) suffered from the victim E (V, franchis) with approximately 3 weeks of medical treatment, such as franchising franchis and tensions that require a maximum of 4 weeks of medical treatment, and the victim I (V, 42 years of age) with respect to the franchising franchis and tensions that require a maximum of 3 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to C, E, and F;

1. Each statement of H, G, and I;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2) (the actual survey report);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3(1) and proviso of Article 3(2)3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;