For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment ordering the Defendant to collect additional collection of KRW 75 million.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the degree of proof of criminal proceeds and the premise of additional collection, which are subject to a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, without exhaust all necessary deliberations in its judgment.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.