A A shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 4 million won.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

[Presumption Facts] Defendant A, as the actual operator of C Co., Ltd. established for the purpose of the housing construction business, etc. (hereinafter “C”), lent C’s construction business registration certificate to enable Defendant B to perform the new construction of loan located D at the time of Seosansan. On March 9, 2015, Defendant B testified that Defendant B appeared as a witness and lent C’s license in a lawsuit claiming construction price in relation to the said company.

Accordingly, on August 30, 2016, Defendant A was indicted for violating the Framework Act on Construction Industry concerning the Lending of Construction License, and planned to increase the number of perjury by aiding and abetting Defendant B.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A

A. On April 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) discussed the method of responding to a criminal trial by meeting B in the branch of the Daejeon Prison Embag-ro, the Sung-dong, Seogdong-ro, 62-19, in order to discuss the method of responding to the criminal trial; and (b) “E is free from the end of the day.”

In lieu of this, C shall be the corporation without reason to be dismissed;

Does a company which is well-grounded and well-grounded in the public office? Does it be a face to the public office;

E had B make a false testimony by stating that he was exempted from the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the city.

B testified to the effect that, on June 29, 2017, at the Gwangju District Court, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the instant case violating the Framework Act on Construction Industry (No. 2016 High Court Order 3812), and the Defendant testified to the effect that “No. C’s license was granted with respect to construction work of Edsan C” as described in paragraph (2).

In this respect, the defendant instigated B to give perjury.

(b) A perjury;