A and C shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, and by imprisonment for six months, respectively.

provided that this judgment has become final and conclusive.

At around 22:40 on April 3, 2014, the Defendants were drinking together at the main point of “I” located at H 1st floor in Suwon-gu, Busan, and Defendant C, under the influence of alcohol, was able to walk the horses to K, who is the day of the victim J (the age of 18) in front of the above main corridor, and was unable to return to K at approximately 30 minutes at the seat of K. The Defendants were able to call for the victim who was going to find K and were able to talk.

1. At around 23:00 on April 3, 2014, Defendant A reported that there was a vision between C and the victim in the front corridor of the toilet located in the above main station. Around 23:00, Defendant A saw that the victim was threatened with two main stations, and caused a shoulderer disease, which is a dangerous object, and kiddd the victim’s chest, and threatened the victim, such as harming the victim by drinking the victim.

2. Defendant B: (a) around April 3, 2014, at around 23:20, 2014, considered that Defendant B’s wife A, who was faced with a riot due to the reasons set forth in paragraph (1), was exposed to the wind outside a place where an alcohol disease is accumulated, and (b) threatened the victim, such as the victim and the victim, who was faced with the face; (c) was able to take the fluor’s disease, which is a dangerous thing for the victim; and (d) by threatening the victim, the victim was threatened.

3. Defendant C committed assault, around April 3, 2014, on the grounds that Defendant C did not take a measure as soon as possible against M, a police officer belonging to the Busan Coast Guard Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report on the grounds specified in paragraphs (1) and (2), on the grounds that he did not take a measure immediately even though M, who was a police officer belonging to the Busan Coast Guard Station, was in the same line of duty. Defendant C committed assault against M, such as “this spari, this spari, this spari police officer,” voiceed M as “M’s chest by two hand.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to the Prosecutor's Office;

1. Each police protocol of statement against K, M, and N.