명예훼손
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. On August 3, 2011, the Defendant found D Hospital 128 located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and thereby damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, stating that “E lent 50,000 won within the money and went back to the return of the money to another hospital to avoid this,” despite the fact that the victim E did not borrow money from the Defendant and does not move to another hospital.”
2. The Defendant asserted that the date and time indicated in the facts charged was not between the investigative agency and the investigative agency, and that there was no statement as stated in the facts charged.
As shown in the facts charged in this case, E/F’s statement was made at E/F’s police and court, but the above evidence and the fact-finding results of this court’s DSeoul Hospital are acknowledged as follows. ① At the time of his husband’s admission into D Hospital, E was known to F as being hospitalized in the sick room such as the husband of F at the time of his husband’s admission into D Hospital. On August 3, 2011, G transferred to G from D Hospital to G to G hospital, the said statement was found to be the same as indicated in the facts charged. ② From among those who found D Hospital at the time, E stated that he/she was hospitalized from F, E did not appear to have been the Defendant, and thus, the Defendant continued to claim for defamation against the Defendant; ③ from G to H and H hospitals on the same date, the Defendant stated that he/she had been hospitalized to G around 31, 201, and the Defendant stated that he/she had been discharged to G around 38, 2010.