1. On February 21, 2015, at around 11:00, the Defendant interfered with business, the Defendant continued to comply with the Victim C’s request for the payment of the victim’s money at the restaurant operated by the victim C located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, and interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as: (a) going through the victim’s call at intervals of 5 to 10 minutes without any particular reason; and (b) going against the victim’s restaurant business at the intervals of 5 to 10 minutes; and (c) going through

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph (1) of the same Article, expressed that the head of the police station affiliated with the branch of the branch police station, who was dispatched upon receipt of a report by the said C, attempted to arrest the Defendant in the act of committing a crime, such as obstruction of business, etc., and expressed that “the head of the branch police station affiliated with the branch police station of the branch police station,” “the head of a bit of a bit of a bitch bit of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bit

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. Application of each police protocol of statement to E, C, and F

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

2. Among concurrent crimes, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act include the following facts: (a) the defendant has a variety of records of identical violent crimes; (b) the defendant was in a trial due to other violent crimes; (c) the defendant committed the crime in this case without being aware of it; (d) the police officer's arms, plucks, plucks, spits, or spits, etc. against face; and (e) the degree of interference with public duties, such as b