However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 7, 2018, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license, was at the time designated as a child protection zone at the time, at a speed of 40 km and had a duty of care to observe the speed limit and to prevent traffic accidents in advance by safely driving in accordance with signal apparatus’s direction. In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to comply with the speed limit and to prevent traffic accidents in advance by safely driving in accordance with signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this at a limited speed exceeding 74 km and caused injury to the victim E, in violation of the left-hand turn signal, to the right side of the victim E driving in accordance with the new subparagraph from the right side of the vehicle in front of the defendant's vehicle and continuously installed on the right side due to the victim's signal, etc. on the crosswalk, which is installed on the right side of the defendant's vehicle, to undergo approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment to the victim E due to the shock, such as "large cerebrsty in which there is no five heat in two, open two, and no one two, and to undergo about 8 weeks of medical treatment to the victim G on the vehicle of the defendant, such as "a closed felite of the upper felite," which requires approximately 3 weeks of medical treatment to the victim H, "an injury to the victim," and "an injury to the victim's 60th day of the victim's side of the crosswalk," and "an injury to the victim's 20th week," and "an injury to the victim's 2."

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. Each statement of E and I;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, and on-site map;