beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.02.10 2016구단227

상이등급구분신체검사7급판정처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 1, 2010, the Plaintiff was discharged from active service in the Army on November 30, 2012, and was discharged from active service on November 30, 2012. On June 8, 2012, the Plaintiff was discharged from active service in the Army, and was hospitalized at the Armed Forces Hospital for the Armed Forces on June 13, 2012, when he was hospitalized with knee and knenee and a severe number of snee and snee-snee-snee-sle-sle-sle-sle-sle-sle-sle-sle-sle-sle-sle-sle-sle-sle-sle-sle

B. On June 18, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the basis of its application basis, and the Defendant recognized the Plaintiff as a soldier or policeman wounded on the part of the Plaintiff on the part of the Plaintiff’s “Sslives of the first half of the first half of the first half of the first half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the year.” However, on August 26, 2015, the physical examination conducted by the National Veterans Hospital on the date of the physical examination conducted by the National Veterans Hospital on August 26, 2015, the Plaintiff deliberated and decided to be “under the first half of the first half of the first half of the year,” and the Defendant rendered the instant disposition against the Plaintiff on November 2,

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is limited to not less than 1/4 of the field of tolerance movement due to the instant wounds, and despite appropriate treatment, the fire safety due to climatic damage constituted not less than 9.9m and not less than 10m in width. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion falls under Grade 6(2)(819 or 7’s class 8122 of the disability rating.

Meanwhile, Article 14(3) [Attachment Table 3] of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons of Distinguished Service to

7. Enforcement Rule of the same Act concerning the impairment of arms and fingers;

7. Obstruction of arms and fingers;

(b)The decision on the applicable grade shall recognize Class 6 Section 2 (7123) as a person who needs to be equipped with a fixed gear at all times due to interference with daily life, regardless of whether it is dynamic, automatic or automatic, and shall not interfere with daily life, but in labor.