However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 01:20 on January 5, 2015, the Defendant, at the front of the Dongdong Police Station C District located in Busan Dongdong-gu, Busan, stated that “I will not face the taxi at the seat of the Defendant,” on the ground that D, who did not pay the taxi expenses, “I will pay for the taxi expenses and return home,” and obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order and criminal investigation of the above police officers, by cutting off the Defendant’s top, snick, snick, snick, snick, and snick.” On the other hand, the Defendant, at the office of the above Dongdong-gu, laid down the bridge of the above D with the Defendant’s hand, thereby obstructing the Defendant from performing his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (e.g., e., e., crime and serious reflect) or more;