1. Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment below in relation to the injury, in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below was just in finding the Defendant guilty of the injury of this case on the grounds as stated in its holding, and there was no error exceeding the bounds of the principle

In addition, the argument that the defendant's act constitutes self-defense is not a legitimate ground for appeal, as it is alleged in the ground of appeal that the defendant did not consider it as the ground for appeal or that the court below did not consider it as the subject of judgment

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court was justifiable to have convicted the Defendant of the charges of the instant accusation on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules

3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.