1. Forging a private document;

(a) On October 23, 2013, the Defendant, without authority, made use of a tampial pen in the face of a promissory note, with the aim of exercising at the office of 2nd floor (main floor) D of the building in the Bridge-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on October 23, 2013, stating, “40,000 won and KRW 40,000,000: October 23, 2013; the issuer’s address: the issuer’s name and address: F, which was kept adjacent to the name of the Defendant.”

The F’s seal imprint affixed the F’s seal imprint and forged a promissory note in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant stated “Name F: F: address address of Jeonjin-gu E” on the power of attorney without authority and without authority for the purpose of exercising at the above date, time, place, and at the same time, that the Defendant was in custody next to the F’s name.

The F’s seal imprint affixed the F’s seal imprint, thereby forging a letter of delegation in F’s name, which is a private document on rights, obligations, and proof of facts.

2. The Defendant, at the above date and place, presented to G and H a certified judicial scrivener who did not know that a promissory note and power of attorney forged as above was forged, respectively, and exercised the said investigation document.

3. On November 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had a notary public located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, K in charge of notarial acts enter the fact of insolvency in the said promissory note and the instrument of fairness, which is the original instrument, on the grounds of the power of attorney, in the J-office.

4. Around that time, the Defendant had the Defendant keep a certificate of the fairness of the bill containing false facts, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to G;

1. A copy of a promissory note, a copy of the bill of lading process, a power of attorney, and the application of existing statutes;

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising the above investigation document), Article 228(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of entering the original document of the process), Articles 229 and 228 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime.