물품대금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 31,228,000 for the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff
(a) As regards KRW 18,138,00 among them, from September 1, 2018:
(b) 7,590 among them;
1. On June 2, 2017, the remaining payment method of the product description (cost) at the 0th of June 2, 2017: TMF 24,200,000 7,260,000 as of the end of the pertinent month after the completion of the customer company’s approval; on July 1, 2017, PDD W 24,200,007, 2607, 000, 260, 260, 000, 000, 000 or 00, 000 or 00, 00 or 00,00 or 00,00 or 00,000 or 00,00 or 00,000 or 00,000 or 00,000 or 00,000 or 00,000 or more of the 208th of July 21, 2017.
A. In five times between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, each gold production contract with the following contents (hereinafter referred to as “the first contract”) was concluded in the form of “the first contract”, and a total of the contracts was referred to as “each of the instant contracts”).
The following table's "contract amount" and "amount" are all the amount including value-added tax.
B. On May 2, 2018, the Plaintiff, at the Defendant’s request, engaged in the revision and revision of the TPP on May 2, 2018 (including value-added tax) and “BDM incidental cost below 1,760,000 won (including value-added tax) for the revision of the 4,400,000 won (hereinafter “TM adjustment”).
【The ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, and the entries in Gap 1 through 7 (each number is included), the purport of the entire pleadings, including the number number.
2. Determination as to the cause of action
A. As long as the Plaintiff manufactured and supplied gold punishment to the Defendant by the delivery date pursuant to each of the instant contracts, the Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant is liable to pay the unpaid balance, the number of TM maintenance, and the BDM incidental expenses under each of the instant contracts, as long as the payment period has arrived.
On this issue, the defendant asserts as follows.
In other words, ① the defendant's primary event is the defendant's customer.