성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name of "C by employing female employees, equipped with 7 massage rooms inside the third and the third floor, 2 smuggling rooms in which shower facilities are installed, 1 carcers, 1 waiting rooms, and 4 CCTVs."
At around 18:00 on December 4, 2017, the Defendant arranged commercial sex acts against the non-residents from June 2016 to December 4, 2017, by providing them with cash of KRW 1.30,00,000 as the price for commercial sex acts, and by providing them with guidance to the smuggling.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. E statements;
1. Voluntary accompanying report and report of internal investigation (e.g., details of crackdown);
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, such as field photographs, business reports, etc.;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Suspension of Execution Act (the conditions favorable to the defendant among the reasons for sentencing) (the following sentencing) is [the scope of the recommended sentence], and the basic area of the two types of sexual traffic crimes subject to 19 years of age or older, mediation of commercial sex acts, etc. (such as brokerage of commercial sex acts due to business and receipt of consideration, etc.), (six months or one year or one year or four months): The sentencing range (no special person subject to sentencing): June or one year or four months (the decision of sentence] unfavorable to the defendant; the sentencing range is not easy in light of the size, form, and period of the crime. There is a history of a fine imposed on June 3, 2015. The fact that there is no previous conviction for the defendant to recognize and seriously reflect any error that is favorable to the defendant. In addition, the sentencing conditions prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act are combined.