beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.04.13 2016고단5198

특수폭행등

Text

Punishment of the defendant shall be 6,00,000 won.

If a fine is not paid, the period of 10,000 won shall be calculated as one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 04:35 on July 31, 2016, the Defendant, “2016 Highest 5198, the Defendant,” intended to see D’s head by attaching D’s head to the Defendant’s head on the ground that the Defendant sent the text message to the Defendant’s wife prior to the said C convenience store (the age of 52) on the ground that the so-called Joseon Party D (n, e.g., the age of 52) had expressed his or her desire to do so.

The Defendant assaulted the victim D with an illness, which is a dangerous object.

The defendant of "2016 Highest 5165" had been close to D from about three years ago, but Edo has been in mind D, so it did not have good appraisal on several occasions due to the problem.

On October 7, 2016, at the front of the C convenience store located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, the Defendant told E (47 cm) (hereinafter “C”) to the effect that it is not good to walk away from the former Defendant’s wife on the ground that it was not good to walk away from the phone, and used the phone to “the knife the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

The Defendant threatened the victim E with excessive excess goods, which are dangerous objects.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to E and D;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 261, 260 (1), 284, and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The determination of the punishment under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be recognized as erroneous, and those under the influence of alcohol shall be deemed to have occurred.

It is very wrong that a crime related to victims E committed during the suspended execution period.

In addition, there are three criminal records of fines.

However, all victims do not want punishment.

It seems that the statements and actions of the victims were the origin of this case.