beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.04.20 2016고단5684

무고교사등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year, by imprisonment for six months, and by a fine of three million won, respectively.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

A A A The representative director of the F in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. established for the purpose of manufacturing environmental facilities in Gwangju Northern-gu, the employee of the F in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and Defendant C was an external business person of the F in the Dispute Resolution Co.

G is the wife of G.

1. Defendant A (orless teacher);

A. In June 2015, Defendant A, who is not a senior teacher to Defendant B, applied for substitute payment for wages and retirement allowances to Defendant B from the office of the “FF for the settlement of disputes” to Defendant B, and received wages, etc.

In order to do so, one representative shall be selected to file a petition for overdue payment and substitute payment with the Labor Office, and the representative shall be appointed to handle the petition for overdue payment and substitute payment. On July 21, 2015, Defendant B is the register of workers for the overdue payment, and the working person is 21.

Defendant B, who is well aware of the fact that there are false workers and 14 actual workers, signed the party’s selection column in the party’s selection book, and had Defendant B sign the party’s selection column to the party’s delayed payment of wages, thereby having Defendant B correct the Defendant A’s delayed payment of wages.

Defendant

A around August 5, 2015, Defendant B had Defendant B submit a false statement to the effect that “A would punish 21 workers because it did not pay wages to 21 workers.”

As a result, Defendant A instigated Defendant B to commit a criminal act for the purpose of having Defendant A punished.

B. Defendant A, at the office of the FF in charge of the settlement of accounts for Defendant C around July 2015, Defendant C, “In the same case, it is difficult for the company to make it difficult for Defendant C to do so, and the employee’s salary may be resolved upon application of substitute payment, but it does not remain.

It is intended to apply for substitute payment in the name of the privately placed real estate (C) after being damaged and living together.