건축법위반
All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The person who installed the instant container, which is a temporary building of the gist of the grounds for appeal, is Defendant A, and even G and H were installed.
Even if the defendant B corporation's work is limited.
2. The court below stated the reasons in detail, and found the Defendants not guilty on the grounds that it is difficult to recognize that Defendant A installed the instant container or that the said container was related to the Defendant B’s business, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise. The court below’s judgment is just and acceptable on the grounds of comparison with the reasoning of the judgment below. Thus, the prosecutor’s assertion is
3. According to the conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal against the Defendants is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.