2. The judgment of the court below recognizes the defendant's mistake, which is the primary offender, and the circumstances to be considered in the course of committing the crime are favorable circumstances, but the court below seems to have determined the punishment by fully considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and the court below seems to have not changed in circumstances that could be different from the judgment of the court below. In full view of the circumstances of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment, etc., the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit, since it is not recognized that the defendant's punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.