If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who operates a resting restaurant in the apartment parking lot B in Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu.

Anyone who intends to operate a resting restaurant business shall report to the competent administrative agency.

그럼에도 피고인은 관할 관청에 신고하지 아니하고, 2017. 6. 13. 경부터 점검 일인 2017. 6. 27.까지 매주 화요일 위 장소에 천막 구조 면적 약 36㎡ 규모에서 상호 없이 떡볶이 볶음 솥 1개, 어묵 솥 1개, 튀김 솥 1개, 가스 시설 및 기타 조리기구 일체 등을 설치하여 놓고 불특정 다수인을 상대로 떡볶이 (1 인 분 2,000원), 튀김 (2 개 1,000원), 오뎅 (2 개 1,000원) 등을 조리하여 하루 평균 20만 원의 매출을 올리는 영업행위를 하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant did not report to the competent authorities on the restaurant business and did not report the restaurant business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement and a written approval of the public official in charge;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing flag photographs;

1. Article 97 of the relevant Act and Articles 97 subparagraph 1 and 37 (4) of the Food Sanitation Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, has recognized and reflected his mistake.

However, in light of the legislative purport of the Food Sanitation Act that intends to protect the health of the people by preventing sanitary harm caused by food and improving the quality of food nutrition, the crime of this case is less complicated than that of the crime of this case.

There is no room to view it.

In light of the structure, sales, etc., the business nature is not low.

In addition to this, all the circumstances revealed in the trial process, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.