사기등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.
The application for compensation order of this case by the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.
Punishment of the crime
On January 26, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to be sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act in the Busan District Court’s subsidiary branch on February 3, 2012, and the said judgment was finalized on January 18, 2012. On December 11, 2012, the said judgment was finalized on December 11, 2012, and the Defendant is the Chairperson (State) E in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu. The Defendant is the actual operator of the said company.
"2013 Highest 254"
1. On March 13, 2010, the criminal defendant against the victim F made a false statement to the victim F by calling the victim F at the "OE office of the defendant's operation (ju) in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si, Seoul, and "I will settle the delivery price of KRW 16,56,000 for supply until March 25, 2010, because the number of trees of the low-income company play for 20 tons."
However, the fact was that the (ju) E, which the defendant operated at the time, was in default due to the shortage of funds, and the defendant bears the obligation equivalent to KRW 200,000,000 and the amount in arrears equivalent to KRW 607,691,710, and there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if he receives the delivery of the steel from the victim.
Nevertheless, as above, a false statement was received from the victim at around March 17, 2010, the value of 20 tons of steel at the 20 tons of steel-building site located in G in Sung-si around 17, 201.
"2013 Highest 513"
2. On April 29, 2009, the Defendant entered into a contract with I and I in relation to K condominium construction works on the fourth parcel, such as Chuncheon-si J, J, etc., which was interrupted, on April 29, 2009.
However, at the time, the construction was difficult because the amount of national tax equivalent to 250 million won was in arrears, and the defendant could perform the construction without a comprehensive construction license because his personal and company debt amounted to several billion won. In fact, the above construction cannot be changed to another company, or there is no ability to reduce the subcontracting work.