2. It is recognized that the Defendant’s mistake is divided, and the amount of damage caused by the instant crime is relatively minor.

However, the crime of this case is not good; the defendant committed repeatedly the crime of this case within two months after being released from prison, even though he had been convicted of the same kind of crime, and even during the period of repeated crime of the same crime, within two months after being released from prison; the damage recovery or agreement has not been reached up to the trial; and the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case are considered, such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.