설비대금반환 등 청구의 소
1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall consist of a principal lawsuit and a counterclaim.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the instant case is that of the court of first instance citing the reasoning of the judgment as to the instant case, since it is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance excluding adding or adding the following matters. Thus, it is citing this as is in accordance
2. The part added or used in addition shall be 8 parallels in the judgment of the court of first instance with “not” of 3 pages, and the part shall be hereinafter referred to as “in the event of defects in the instant machine.”
The following shall be added to the fourth 6 pages of the first instance judgment “no evidence”:
Considering the following circumstances as a result of the appraisal by this court appraiser C on May 2, 2018, which can be seen by comprehensively taking into account the descriptions or images of Gap’s evidence 16 through 19 (including paper numbers), the appraisal by this court appraiser C on the fact-finding results and the overall purport of oral pleadings, it is difficult to find it difficult to acknowledge that the non-defluence, as alleged by the plaintiff, is due to existing defects in the machinery of this case supplied by the defendant during the ultra-waveing period, which generate an electricity chemical compound by using the first-waveing machine and vibration, the first-waveing machine equipment using the first-waveing machine and vibration, the first-waveing machine and equipment incidental thereto (the first-waveing machine and vibration), the first-waveing machine and vibration generation by using the first-waveing machine and vibration, the first-waveing machine and vibration generation by using the first-wave measuring machine and vibration.