However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the defendants is against the defendants for one year.

On October 10, 2013, at around 16:00 on October 16, 2013, the Defendants urged the victim D to sell 1,300,000 won in cash from the cross PC bank near the opening of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

On October 11, 2013, around 00:50 on October 11, 2013, the Defendants came to the front of the guards room of the Guro-gu Seoul E Apartment 102, and Defendant A had the key of the above Otoba in front of the guards room. Defendant B used the key to the above Oba in front of the above guards room, and Defendant B driven one above 1.3 million won of the market price owned by the victim, which was parked in front of the above guards room, and Defendant A went to the back seat.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A copy of bankbook;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each photograph (for example, CCTV, stoba, key to the suspect B);

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Taking into account the fact that an agreement has been reached with the victim);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) shall apply to the defendant A without criminal punishment, and