2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Defendant

A on September 27, 2012, sentenced a one-year suspended sentence to one-year imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (competence), and was sentenced to eight months in imprisonment with prison labor by obstructing the performance of official duties at the Seoul Northern District Court on November 27, 2013 during the suspended execution period, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 3, 2014, and the said suspended sentence became void and the execution of each of the said suspended sentence was completed on May 28, 2015.

The Defendants did not make an appraisal to the ordinary victim on the ground that the Defendants returned to the above main point E, which was the victim D (36 tax)’s internal relationship with the Defendant B and the past internal relationship, and they were working at the above main point, and that there was a letter to the Defendant B, “I am off and am off, am off, am off, am off,” and that there was a letter to the Defendant B, “I am off and am off, am off,” respectively.

The Defendants, from around 04:30 on April 1, 2016 to from around 06:00, 06:00, she met a trial cost, such as that the victim satising in concert with the victim while drinking alcohol in the “G package car” located in the Gyeonggi-si, the Government of Gyeonggi-si, and that the victim satising without the satising, Defendant B she is not able to see the Defendant A with her hand.

Defendant A called “,” and Defendant A had the face of the victim taken out of the victim, and she had the victim taken out of the victim, and she again taken the victim’s face into the victim’s face in drinking.

Then, the defendant B does not have any container for the victim.

In other words, the victim's face can be seen as a drinking, and the victim's face was not yet finite.

He shall not be aware of it.

“I am out of the damaged person,” and “I am the same as I am under the suspension of the execution of the internal capacity.”

"To threaten the victim's face" and make it possible to take the victim's face.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim, such as the removal of the bones, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A] 1.